Monday, October 27, 2014

First draft

 In the modern times, the Internet can be referred to as a great current of information, filled with ever-flowing knowledge that can both be beneficial and harmful simultaneously. Its vastness and magnificiency can be compared to that of a deep ocean, full of exotic marine lives and providing us with many gifts from nature, but also infinitely dangerous and constantly threatening us to consume and drown everything that dares to cross its territory. Internet can also be very much useful depending on how we make use of it, but all internet users are always at risk of becoming victims of crimes that are commited online. That was the exact reason why lawmakers brought the issue of internet anonymity to light, and bypassed legislations that limit anonymity of internet users to certain extent. Implemented in 2002, the South Korean government made it compulsory for internet users to go through self verification process by revealing their real names and social security numbers before being able to post their thoughts online or comment on a post. Originally implemented to prevent illegal election processes from being conducted online, this legislation quickly evolved into an combined effort by the govenment to prevent the spreading of unidentified information leaks and to gain control of the unexplored sections on the internet. Although the original legislation was shut down on 2012, ideas of regulating the internet still remain. However, due to many reasons that stem from various perspectives, I strongly believe that anonymity should be protected on the internet.

According to a research done by GlobalWebIndex, 56% of internet users feel unsafe globally because of the fact that their anonymity is not guaranteed, and 26% of the users make use of various privacy tools like history erasers to stay hidden. This shows the growing awareness of the people towards the dangers of internet, and their desire to not expose themselves to the ever-existing cyber- predators, constantly waiting to prey upon unsuspecting users who have foolishly let their personal information fall into the hands of abusers.
Such researches signal the beginning of a new era. Now has come a time when information can be counted as power, and the significance of knowledge is emphasized more than ever. Information is regarded as resources that are to be protected by all means, to be kept away from negative consequences. Internet anonymity came to light in such situation. Driven by the users' secrecy and the lawmakers' constant lust for absolute control, a battle for anonymity on the internet is raging on more intensely than ever, with both sides each presenting a perfectly logical and feasible argument for the matter.
Then, what is anonymity exactly in the first place? Anonymity on the internet refers to hiding oneself comepletely from the others when surfing the net or posting comments on websites. This includes not revealing ones' real names when writing on the web, or not being obliged to provide our private information, such as social security numbers and phone numbers for the supposed purpose of self-verification. The issue of anonymity has been discussed since the popularization of the internet, and with an ever-increasing number of internet crimes, internet anonymity has been regarded as what is referred to as 'a double-edged sword', able to benefit others but also causing harm on the other side of the perspective. With the debate still raging on about this matter, incidents that continuously remind us of the importance of having a firm stand on the matter of internet anonymity never ceases, and make us wonder in fear when the above mentioned matter will eventually be resolved. One famous example of this incident would be the international cyber attacks launched upon prominent websites by a group of international hackers who named themselves the 'anonymous'. With their attacks, countless government facilities and foundations have been left powerless. This shows us how chaos in cyberspace can strike fear into our minds and immobilize us in an instant, and also the significance in which the problem of internet anonymity should be resolved ,as well as a need for a implmentation of a suitable solution, in order for the world to enjoy stable lives on the internet.

  Perhaps the first task to finding out how anonmity can interact in both physical world and the internet world be to correctly identify the characteristics of the cyber-world that differentiates it from the actual world of physical beings. The internet is not made up of things we could touch; it is constantly ever-shifting, and is never ruled by any physical laws that make our physical world true to touch and stimulus. Nothing is vritually impossible in the internet. As long as one has the correct knowledge and skills to alter the cyberspace, he can make absolute advantage of the internet, and manipulate the cyber-world to do his biddings. However, this does not apply to all of us who make use of the internet. Only a minority of the users are equipped with skills and capability needed to turn the internet world to their advantage. This leaves the rest, a myriad of internet users who have just enough skills to suf the web, purchase items through online shopping malls and transfer money into bank account through the web, completely vulnerable to various risks and threats that loom in the darkness of the intenet world, waiting to feed on unsuspecting users who are not capable of dealing with whatever challenges they face on the internet. In other words, the internet is just as large as, perhaps more vast and greater than the real world, but unlike in the latter, users of the former do not have a complete control of their surroundings, and their safety is also not guarnanteed. To them, internet is just like being out in the wild, full of surprises. Thus, a device that can somewhat help the users protect their information to some extent should be put up. Protecting the anonymity of the users can play this role, and ensure safer internet lives.

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, states that:
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
This is another example that shows why internet anonymity should be protected, in
regards to abiding to the basic rights of the internet users. As mentioned in the Declaration above, everyone is bestowed upon rights to freely exchange their thoughts and ideas. This right is guaranteed from their birth, and is not to be infringed upon till their death. This right also applies in the cyberspace, and now that the internet has become one of the most active grounds for exchanging opinions, the importance of granting freedom of seech to all the users is now strongly emphasized.
One most typical, as well as effective, way of ensuring such rights on the internet is by allowing people to be anonymous on the web. With their names and personal information revealed disclosed, people will feel intimidated and fear that their ideas will be monitored, afraid that any opinions that are against the current trend might be traced back to them through their exposed information. This prevents the healthy flow o information. It is a well known fact that democracy depends on the citizens' active particpation into formation of national policies through discussions. With their identities exposed on the internet, no more conversation shall occur, and democracy might fall. It has also been historically proven that the goverment's call for more power and absolute control always began with their efforts to obstruct public opinions. The Soviet Union established perfect control through prohibiting discussions among people and promoting propogandas. A more recent example would be the NSA's attempt to have a constant look at all ongoing electronic communication under excuse of sorting out terrorists. By having people stay anonymous, internet usage shall increase, and active communication will be achieved.

In 2013 June, a shocking news that over 23 million pieces of personal information was leaked into the hands of Chinese hackers rocked the entire Korean Peninsula. These personal information was traced back to 40 of the most prominent websites in Korea, including online bookstores and search engines. Only a year has passed since the implementation of the Personal Information Protection Law by the Korean congress, and the ineffectiveness of such legisaltions was again brought to light. This shows the possible prediction of what tradegy that might occur to billions of internet users worldwide. Without a proper measure to conceal their information, their secrets and private information is set to far higher risks of being commercialized on the market, put on sale secretly for others to freely view and abuse of whatever criminal activities they have in mind. Implementing internet anonymity can help the users protect their secrets off the predators on the web, and prevent anymore information leaks that can be used to create fake IDs, used in various scams, and falsely set up into taking all the blames for something we have never commmitted. Internet anonymity is significant in such a way, and can be a valuable asset in protecting the users.

Some many people do not agree with my opinion that internet anonymity should be protected. They presemt many valid arguments, each backed up by logical evidences. The first argument given by those who oppose internet anonymity is that with anonymity on the internet, more cyberbullying and crimes shall occur. The number of hateful comments will also increase, as people will hide behind the privilege of anonymity for negative purposes. This is well depicted in the case of Nicole Catsouras, an 18-year-old died in a car crash in California in 2006. After the death of Nicole, photographs of her badly disfigured body were posted on the Internet, where anonymous trolls set up fake tribute pages and in some cases e-mailed the photos to her parents with subject lines like “Hey, Daddy, I’m still alive.” Another study conducted by the assistant prfessor at university of Houston also outlined the relationship between the personalities of the 'Internet Trolls' and interent users who prefer to stay anonymous. According to the survey, those who try to conceal themselves on the web is more antisocial, as well as aggressive. These internet trolls abuse their anonymous stand and ppon others, hurting them with hateful comments. The same goes for cyberbullying too. However, what that has to be kept in mind is that those who prey upon others in cyberspace is only a minority, a peck of dust when copared to other responsible, honest internet users who are ready to have what it takes to use the internet freely. A greater good should be strived for, and it is illogical to have all the users give up their rights for anonymity. The problem of cyberbullying that comes with internet anonymity can be attributed to the problem in the social infrastructure and fallacies in the individuals, and alternative solutions can be implemented.

It might seem as if the issue of internet anonymity is simply a matter of another device to be implemented in the internet world, and that not much might change in the event of when anonymity f the users are finally protected on the internet. The truth is, nothing can be further from the truth. Anonymity on the internet is a problem of great significance that will surely affect millions of people worldwide, perhaps billions. With internet anonymity finally protected all over the world, the crime rate, committed both on-line and off-line, will decrease significantly with people's personal information no longer leaking out of control. Political situations shall also improve to a great extent, as people begin expressing their thoughts without fear of redemption or oppression. More creative ideas shall come to light, and another world of enlighenment and happiness can ensue. As the percentage internet usage increases by the second, anonymity will later turn out to be a key measure for protecting people's freedom. Just as the French Revolution that sparked the start of democracy in 1789, implementation of the internet anonymity will be another giant leap in the internet world, and perhaps act as another revoluton, that will this time free all users from intimidation and propoganda in cyberspace.

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Citations and sources

 United Nations (10 September 1948). "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights". UN.org (www.un.org)

"Article 19". International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by UN General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976). 23 March 1976

 

Cases of information leak (Korean)

Credit card companies


KT



Leak of 17 million social security numbers


 

40 Korean websites


SC bank Korea


Week 10-Conclusion

  It might seem as if the issue of internet anonymity is simply a matter of another device to be implemented in the internet world, and that not much might change in the event of when anonymity f the users are finally protected on the internet. The truth is, nothing can be further from the truth. Anonymity on the internet is a problem of great significance that will surely affect millions of people worldwide, perhaps billions. With internet anonymity finally protected all over the world, the crime rate, committed both on-line and off-line, will decrease significantly with people's personal information no longer leaking out of control. Political situations shall also improve to a great extent, as people begin expressing their thoughts without fear of redemption or oppression. More creative ideas shall come to light, and another world of enlighenment and happiness can ensue. As the percentage internet usage increases by the second, anonymity will later turn out to be a key measure for protecting people's freedom. Just as the French Revolution that sparked the start of democracy in 1789, implementation of the internet anonymity will be another giant leap in the internet world, and perhaps act as another revoluton, that will this time free all users from intimidation and propoganda in cyberspace.

Week 9-Refutation and concession

1. What is my thesis?
Internet anonymity should be protected in cyberspace.

2. What is the opposite position?
Internet users have to reveal themselves on the web

3. What arguments can I anticipate?
a) With anonymity on the internet, more cyberbullying and crimes shall  occur.
     Hateful comments will also increase.

4. How will I counter those arguments?
a) It does not make sense for the majority to suffer because of these minority of the users

My Refutation and concession

Some many people do not agree with my opinion that internet anonymity should be protected. They presemt many valid arguments, each backed up by logical evidences. The first argument given by those who oppose internet anonymity is that with anonymity on the internet, more cyberbullying and crimes shall occur. The number of hateful comments will also increase, as people will hide behind the privilege of anonymity for negative purposes. This is well depicted in the case of Nicole Catsouras, an 18-year-old died in a car crash in California in 2006. After the death of Nicole, photographs of her badly disfigured body were posted on the Internet, where anonymous trolls set up fake tribute pages and in some cases e-mailed the photos to her parents with subject lines like “Hey, Daddy, I’m still alive.” Another study conducted by the assistant prfessor at university of Houston also outlined the relationship between the personalities of the 'Internet Trolls' and interent users who prefer to stay anonymous. According to the survey, those who try to conceal themselves on the web is more antisocial, as well as aggressive. These internet trolls abuse their anonymous stand and ppon others, hurting them with hateful comments. The same goes for cyberbullying too. However, what that has to be kept in mind is that those who prey upon others in cyberspace is only a minority, a peck of dust when copared to other responsible, honest internet users who are ready to have what it takes to use the internet freely. A greater good should be strived for, and it is illogical to have all the users give up their rights for anonymity. The problem of cyberbullying that comes with internet anonymity can be attributed to the problem in the social infrastructure and fallacies in the individuals, and alternative solutions can be implemented.

Week 8-The confirmation

1. What is my thesis?
Internet anonymity should be protected.

2. What types of source am I using to defend my thesis?
I am using statistcs and surveys, prominent cases, as well as constitutions and legislations enacted by the government.

3. Are my arguments mostly based on evidence, logic or emotion?
My arguments are hardly based on emotion, as the following thesis requires a thorough analysis of the matter without any emotional appeals, so as to grasp a clear idea of what the thesis mainly concerns. Instead, hard evidences and logical thinking processes take up most of my essay.

My Confirmation

  Perhaps the first task to finding out how anonmity can interact in both physical world and the internet world be to correctly identify the characteristics of the cyber-world that differentiates it from the actual world of physical beings. The internet is not made up of things we could touch; it is constantly ever-shifting, and is never ruled by any physical laws that make our physical world true to touch and stimulus. Nothing is vritually impossible in the internet. As long as one has the correct knowledge and skills to alter the cyberspace, he can make absolute advantage of the internet, and manipulate the cyber-world to do his biddings. However, this does not apply to all of us who make use of the internet. Only a minority of the users are equipped with skills and capability needed to turn the internet world to their advantage. This leaves the rest, a myriad of internet users who have just enough skills to suf the web, purchase items through online shopping malls and transfer money into bank account through the web, completely vulnerable to various risks and threats that loom in the darkness of the intenet world, waiting to feed on unsuspecting users who are not capable of dealing with whatever challenges they face on the internet. In other words, the internet is just as large as, perhaps more vast and greater than the real world, but unlike in the latter, users of the former do not have a complete control of their surroundings, and their safety is also not guarnanteed. To them, internet is just like being out in the wild, full of surprises. Thus, a device that can somewhat help the users protect their information to some extent should be put up. Protecting the anonymity of the users can play this role, and ensure safer internet lives.
 
Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, states that:
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
  This is another example that shows why internet anonymity should be protected, in
regards to abiding to the basic rights of the internet users. As mentioned in the Declaration above, everyone is bestowed upon rights to freely exchange their thoughts and ideas. This right is guaranteed from their birth, and is not to be infringed upon till their death. This right also applies in the cyberspace, and now that the internet has become one of the most active grounds for exchanging opinions, the importance of granting freedom of seech to all the users is now strongly emphasized.
  One most typical, as well as effective, way of ensuring such rights on the internet is by allowing people to be anonymous on the web. With their names and personal information revealed disclosed, people will feel intimidated and fear that their ideas will be monitored, afraid that any opinions that are against the current trend might be traced back to them through their exposed information. This prevents the healthy flow o information. It is a well known fact that democracy depends on the citizens' active particpation into formation of national policies through discussions. With their identities exposed on the internet, no more conversation shall occur, and democracy might fall. It has also been historically proven that the goverment's call for more power and absolute control always began with their efforts to obstruct public opinions. The Soviet Union established perfect control through prohibiting discussions among people and promoting propogandas. A more recent example would be the NSA's attempt to have a constant look at all ongoing electronic communication under excuse of sorting out terrorists. By having people stay anonymous, internet usage shall increase, and active communication will be achieved.
 
  In 2013 June, a shocking news that over 23 million pieces of personal information was leaked into the hands of Chinese hackers rocked the entire Korean Peninsula. These personal information was traced back to 40 of the most prominent websites in Korea, including online bookstores and search engines. Only a year has passed since the implementation of the Personal Information Protection Law by the Korean congress, and the ineffectiveness of such legisaltions was again brought to light. This shows the possible prediction of what tradegy that might occur to billions of internet users worldwide. Without a proper measure to conceal their information, their secrets and private information is set to far higher risks of being commercialized on the market, put on sale secretly for others to freely view and abuse of whatever criminal activities they have in mind.  Implementing internet anonymity can help the users protect their secrets off the predators on the web, and prevent anymore information leaks that can be used to create fake IDs, used in various scams, and falsely set up into taking all the blames for something we have never commmitted. Internet anonymity is significant in such a way, and can be a valuable asset in protecting the users.

-Negative consequences of internet anonymity, and some following examples-

Source:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/opinion/30zhuo.html
(Problems related to internet anonymity)

My Topic:

Internet anonymity should be protected.

What I hope to learn from this source:

I felt that to this moment, I have been unconsciously inclined towards positive sides of internet anonymity, and only looked for evidences to support te thesis. For a better and a fairer essay, I have decided to find specific examples that are against internet anonymity. These examples can perhaps be used in the refutation  and concession part.

Notes:

-After Alexis Pilkington, a 17-year-old Long Island girl, committed suicide earlier this year, trolls descended on her online tribute page to post pictures of nooses, references to hangings and other hateful comments.
-All 50 states now have stalking, bullying or harassment laws that explicitly include electronic forms of communication.
-Liskula Cohen, a former model, persuaded a New York judge to require Google to reveal the identity of an anonymous blogger who she felt had defamed her, and she has now filed a suit against the blogger.
-Another former model, Carla Franklin, persuaded a judge to force YouTube to reveal the identity of a troll who made a disparaging comment about her on the video-sharing site.
-The technology blog Gizmodo is trying an audition system for new commenters, under which their first few comments would be approved by a moderator or a trusted commenter to ensure quality before anybody else could see them. After a successful audition, commenters can freely post. If over time they impress other trusted commenters with their contributions, they’d be promoted to trusted commenters, too, and their comments would henceforth be featured.
 -Nicole Catsouras, an 18-year-old died in a car crash in California in 2006. After that, photographs of her badly disfigured body were posted on the Internet, where anonymous trolls set up fake tribute pages and in some cases e-mailed the photos to her parents with subject lines like “Hey, Daddy, I’m still alive.”  

Final thoughts:

With these evidences, a deep understanding into the essay will be enabled. With such, further research will be necessary for the next step of writing my essay.

Week 1-Brainstrorming

Brainstorming questions:

 

I. Computers will someday overtake the human brain


http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2001/dec/27/internetnews.onlinesupplement
(7 wonders of the internet world)

'1984' (Roald Dahl)

Big Brother, symbol of oppression by internet from the novel '1984'

 

II. The development of the internet did more harm than good to the world


http://www.webmd.com/parenting/features/4-dangers-internet 
(dangers of the internet-Perspective of parents)

http://education.purduecal.edu/Vockell/CAI/Cai5/cai5dangers.htm
(Point of view of internet users)

http://www.covenanteyes.com/2012/01/03/7-dangers-of-the-internet-for-kids/
(dangers of the internet- perspective of children)

7 Dangers of the Internet for Kids

 

III. Internet anonymity should be granted


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymity
(the concept of anoymity)

http://www.debate.org/debates/Internet-Anonymity-should-be-banned/1/
(pros and cons on why internet anonymity hould be accepted)

Friday, October 24, 2014

Week 7-The Narration

My persuasive argument thesis is:
Internet anonymity should be protected in cyberspace.

1. What do people already know about my topic?

People are already aware of the fact that anonymity in cyberspace is an important subject that could determine the future development of the internet, and that much thought should be given to whether information of the users should be disclosed on the internet. It is also a well known fact that internet anonymity is related to many aspects of the society, from ethical matters to legal issues. This means that abusal of anoymity on the internet can cause multiple serious problems and much care has to be put in when dealing with internet anonymity. However, it has to be noted that not much is known about the specific details of internet anonymity, issues at stake, and possible outcomes that might arise when incorrect decisions have been made, thus adding even more to the significance of the matter.

2. What research has already been done about my topic?
People are not happy with their personal information being visible online, and try to employ various methods to be anonymous. Moreover, a large number of people report that they have experienced being victims of internet crimes, discomfort, as well as harassment, due to their disclosed information online.  
This research supports the perhaps widely known allegation, that people who stay anonymus online tend to be more antisocial and intimate in real life, and are suffering frm various condition such as Narcissim. As a result, these internet users stay to make use of their granted online anonymity to fulfill what they couldn't in real life; their desire to be prominent. This lead to an increase in hateful comments in websites that allow anonymity. However, the research also mentions the difficulties of having people reveal their information due to technological limits and basic constitutions.
3. What are the implications of my argument (What if I'm right? What if I'm right and people ignore me?)
 
With people's identity not protected online, the rate and seriousness of crimes committed through internet will increase dramatically due to the ease at which people can get their hands on ohter's personal information. In addition, people will no longer exchange their thoughts online for fear of having their idnenties exposed, causing a blockage of healthy flow of ideas and inhibiting the development of true democracy.

My Narration



   According to a research done by GlobalWebIndex, 56% of internet users feel unsafe globally because of the fact that their anonymity is not guaranteed, and 26% of the users make use of various privacy tools like history erasers to stay hidden. This shows the growing awareness of the people towards the dangers of internet, and their desire to not expose themselves to the ever-existing cyber- predators, constantly waiting to prey upon unsuspecting users who have foolishly let their personal information fall into the hands of abusers. 
 
   Such researches signal the beginning of a new era. Now has come a time when information can be counted as power, and the significance of knowledge is emphasized more than ever. Information is regarded as resources that are to be protected by all means, to be kept away from negative consequences. Internet anonymity came to light in such situation. Driven by the users' secrecy and the lawmakers' constant lust for absolute control, a battle for anonymity on the internet is raging on more intensely than ever, with both sides each presenting a perfectly logical and feasible argument for the matter.
 
  Then, what is anonymity exactly in the first place? Anonymity on the internet refers to hiding oneself comepletely from the others when surfing the net or posting comments on websites. This includes not revealing ones' real names when writing on the web, or not being obliged to provide our private information, such as social security numbers and phone numbers for the supposed purpose of self-verification. The issue of anonymity has been discussed since the popularization of the internet, and with an ever-increasing number of internet crimes, internet anonymity has been regarded as what is referred to as 'a double-edged sword', able to benefit others but also causing harm on the other side of the perspective. With the debate still raging on about this matter, incidents that continuously remind us of the importance of having a firm stand on the matter of internet anonymity never ceases, and make us wonder in fear when the above mentioned matter will eventually be resolved. One famous example of this incident would be the international cyber attacks launched upon prominent websites by a group of international hackers who named themselves the 'anonymous'.  With their attacks, countless government facilities and foundations have been left powerless. This shows us how chaos in cyberspace can strike fear into our minds and immobilize us in an instant, and also the significance in which the problem of internet anonymity should be resolved ,as well as a need for a implmentation of a suitable solution, in order for the world to enjoy stable lives on the internet.  
 

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Week 6-Introduction-Three parts

  In the modern times, the Internet can be referred to as a great current of information, filled with ever-flowing knowledge that can both be beneficial and harmful simultaneously. Its vastness and magnificiency can be compared to that of a deep ocean, full of exotic marine lives and providing us with many gifts from nature, but also infinitely dangerous and constantly threatening us to consume and drown everything that dares to cross its territory. Internet can also be very much useful depending on how we make use of it, but all internet users are always at risk of becoming victims of crimes that are commited online. That was the exact reason why lawmakers brought the issue of internet anonymity to light, and bypassed legislations that limit anonymity of internet users to certain extent. Implemented in 2002, the South Korean government made it compulsory for internet users to go through self verification process by revealing their real names and social security numbers before being able to post their thoughts online or comment on a post. Originally implemented to prevent illegal election processes from being conducted online, this legislation quickly evolved into an combined effort by the govenment to prevent the spreading of unidentified information leaks and to gain control of the unexplored sections on the internet. Although the original legislation was shut down on 2012, ideas of regulating the internet still remain. However, due to many reasons that stem from various perspectives, I strongly believe that anonymity should be protected on the internet.

1. Attention grabber

-I attracted the attention of the readers by outlining the vastness of the internet and its enormity. I also made an interesting comparison of the internet and the ocean, pointing out the fact that they are both full of knowledge and values.

2. Explains the topic

-An explanation on the topic was done by giving some basic information about the key legislation that brought the looming porblem to light in Korea, including the background of the implmentation of the legislation, as well as the purpose of it. This gives the readers a better understanding of the thesis, and allows them to read o further.


3. My thesis

-I changed the wording on my first thesis, 'anonymity should be granted on the internet' to 'anonymity should be protected on the internet'. Anonymity on the internet is a fundamental right that is only right if given, and I thought by changing the word 'granted' to 'protected', the sense that anonymity should always be a part of internet usage, and that it should be protected by the government is more highlighted.

Classical argument outline

1. The introduction
I will start first by pointing out the clear fact that internet has now grown to take up a large portions of our society, and also highlight how large and great it is. It would be better if I made use of comparisons to make the point about the greatness of the Internet more convincing. I will then move on to giving some background knowledges and basic facts that are crucial in understanding about the conflict regarding the issue of internet anonymity, which will be elaborated further on in the narration later on. A single prominent case that has to do with internet anonymity can also be mentioned to grab the attention of the readers. I will also state what the exact thesis statement of my essay is, so that the readers can have a clear idea of what the essay is about.

2. The narration
I will explain more about what basic facts that have been included in the introduction above and provide more details. The environment and circumstances that made the discussion on the protection of identities on the internet so cricual can also be put in. With these background informations and knowledges regarding internet anonymity set in place, points that should be discussed thorughout the essay can be included to give the readers some ideas about what should be debated about in order for this resolution to be solved. These points include ehtics in cyberspace, internet anonymity viewed in legal terms, and so on. To add on, the stakes of allowing internet anonymity on the internet, as well as the risks that come with revealing our identities on the internet should be set up too.

3. The confirmation
I will start by stating the basic rights of the internet users that should be protected thorugh anonymity. This should come after the explanation of the basic characteristics of the cyberspace, and why it is crucial for people to be protected of their rights even more than in real lives. I will then state that it is useless to try to censor people on the internet, as those who seek to cause harm through the internet can always find a way to do so, out of reach of those who wish to control the cyberspace by forcing its users to reveal their identities. Having people disclose their identities would prove somewhat useful in preventing petty crimes, but it will do nothing to stop those who attempt to cause some serious harm to the others. Moreover, giving the administrators access to all the basically private information  of the citizens will only lead to them being controlled by the govenment, and thus lead to a blockage of healthy flow of ideas and thoughts online. Finally, information disclosure can lead to their abusals, as well as the commericialization of information.

4. The refutation and concession
Without revealing our names on the internet, more cyberbullying will take place
It is also harder to track down offenders on the internet wihout their names, and revealing information can have law to be upheld more easily. In addition, many choose to abuse the right for anonymity given to them by abusing them thorough, making use of them in criminal activites or unethical behaviors. Lastly, Internet is not fully controlled through regulations and rules, and some rein has to be put on individuals to prevent abuse.

5. The summation,
I do agree that there are certain drawbacks to allowing users privacy on the internet. However, due to the fact that much advantages of such measure far outweighs the limits for doing so, internet anonymity should be protected. Instead of having people reveal their identities, the government can instead improve on the infrastructure to solve the problem from different approach.

Monday, October 20, 2014

-Prominent cases regarding internet anonymity-

Source:

http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1222575&cid=40942&categoryId=32854
(prominent cases regarding internet anonymity)

My topic:

Internt anonymity should be granted

 

What I hope to learn from this souce:

I want to find some famous incidents of internet anonymity,  which can be a part of my essay as supporting evidences, and provide me with ome solid ideas on how internet anonymity interact in the real world.

Notes:

The ARMM censorship case

 Julf Helsingius has always felt that the anonymity of the people who use his service should be protected completely (or as completely as possible). Many net users disagreed with this policy and felt that users who employ anonymity services in order to post abusive messages or commit illegal acts should be exposed. One of the greatest supporters of this view was Dick Depew, the news administrator on usenet. Depew strongly disagreed with Helsingius' policy of complete anonymity and announced in March of 1993 that he would cancel all anonymous messages originating from Helsingius' server. Depew had written a piece of software which he called ARMM (standing for Automatic Retroactive Minimal Moderation) which was designed to send out cancel messages instead of posting the anonymous posts. Since Depew was an administrator on usenet, he was in a position to do this, whereas normal users of the system did not have this capability.
After 2 anonymous messages were canceled using the ARMM program, an anonymous user called  retaliated by posting Depew's address of employment and the name and phone number of his supervisor on the net. He told users that he had done this in response to Depew's censorship and urged users to complain to Depew's supervisor. Helsingius eventually deactivated the account of the anonymous user, but never revealed his identity. About a month later, Depew released a revised version of the ARMM program on the Helsingius server, which some people felt was in response to the fact that Helsingius refused to reveal the identity of the user. The revised program severely backfired, both technically and politically. The software had a bug which caused it to post hundreds of messages on various newsgroups, causing a few mailservers to crash and generally making many net users angry. This situation caused a great deal of outcry over attempts at censoring and policing the net. It also caused many users to publicly express their support for Helsingius' policy of absolute anonymity. Both of these issues are extremely important in the ongoing debate about what sort of legal restrictions should be put on the net and what types of legislation will be created for this purpose

*To know what Hesingius is, refer to Research 1

Anonymity and the Church of Scientology

In January of this year, the Church of Scientology asserted that somebody had broken into a CoS computer and had stolen privileged information. An anonymous user then spread this information on the internet and posted it on alt.religion.scientology and other newsgroups, where supporters and critics of the church have been feuding for 3 1/2 years. The church submitted a request to one of the newsgroups to close down completely because the posts had allegedly violated trademarks and copyrights held by the church. The church also threatened to hold the newsgroup operator and Netcom, the internet provider, legally responsible for such violations. A federal judge eventually refused the Church's request for an injunction against Netcom and the newsgroup operator to stop posting such information. The judge ruled that it would be an impossible burden on the service provider to have to monitor all of the traffic through its service. This ruling shows that there is some hope that anonymity on the internet will eventually be legally preserved.
On February 2, lawyers for the Church of Scientology also contacted the operators of several anonymity services, including Julf Helsingius, and demanded that they stop further anonymous posts to the newsgroups or legal action would ensue. After Helsingius made it clear that he would not voluntarily reveal the identity of the user in question, he was informed that the Finnish police were being contacted via Interpol. On February 8, Finnish police informed Helsingius that if he did not reveal the identity of the anonymous user, they would serve him with a search warrant to seize his entire server with the identities of all of the users who utilize his anonymity service. The Finnish police used the fact that the anonymous user was suspected of "unauthorized use of a computer" as the grounds for their search and the confiscation of the information from Julf Helsingius. Faced with the choice between revealing the identity of only one of his users or all of them, Helsingius reluctantly supplied the Finnish police with the name of the anonymous user involved in the CoS case. On February 14, Helsingius is informed that the criminal investigation in the CoS has been dropped. In this case, Helsingius was forced to choose between protecting a user who relied on their service for anonymity at a time when anonymity was crucial and protecting the records of all of the other users of the system. The most practical choice was made and Helsingius intends to continue his anonymity service, but it will be interesting to see if any changes are made in the penet.fi system as a result of this choice. Additionally, the fact that complete anonymity on the internet was compromised by the authorities brings up many legal questions about the future of anonymity on the internet.

Anonymity in criminal cases

Recent debates about regulation of the internet have involved the hot topics of child pornography and abuse. The use of anonymity or pseudonymity in these criminal activities has recently come up in a court case involving two men in Texas. Gene Howland and Daniel Van Deusen ran a bulletin board service called "Lifestyles" in Houston, Texas which provided its more than 1000 subscribers with pornographic material, including child pornography. The two men, using the pseudonyms "Poo Bear" and "Wild One", lured two young boys to their home and forced them to commit sexual acts. Both men were indicted on March 11 on charges of sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault and indecency with a child. Cases such as this one encourage assertions that the internet should be regulated and that anonymity should be eliminated since it enables people to use on-line services to commit criminal acts more easily.

Legislation in South Korea

In 2002, with the increase of internetcrimes, the Krean government has made it compulsory for internet users to go thorugh self verification process before posting writings onto prominent websites. This was legislated in line with the upcoming national election, with the purpose of preventing people from performing illegal election campaigns. Anybody who refuses to go through such processes have to pay a fine of 10000000 Won(10000 USD).
After implementation, several problems regarding infringement of individual rights and so on. This led to the withdrawal of the legslation on 2012.8.23, on account that the effects of such legislation is minimal, and that foreigners without social security numbers have difficulty making use of the websites. It was also shown that a large number of local website users moved to foreign websites, where their personal information need not be revealed. The advantages of the legislation was deemed far less than the disadvantages that followed it, leading to its abolishment.
 

More:

These cases provided me with some real-life examples.
However, some famous examples are not mentioned, such as Anonymous hacks, abusal of the internet through anonymity, and etc. Some more background research in needed.
 

-Basic facts about internet anonymity-

Source:

http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/student-papers/fall95-papers/rigby-anonymity.html (basic facts about internet anonymity)

 

My topic:

Internet anonymity should be granted

What I hope to learn from this source:

I want to grasp some vague idea about internet anonymity and their importance for me to start understanding the topic in depth.

Notes:

 -Anonymity:

1. The quality of state of being unknown or unacknowledged.
2. One that is unknown or unacknowledged.

- How on-line anonymity works

Although internet users can send messages by borrowing other user's accounts or by forging identities, one of the most common and least complicated ways of obtaining anonymity on the internet is by making use of one of many anonymity services. Some of these services are connected directly to specific newsgroups on the usenet. Other anonymity providers are global and service the entire internet. These anonymity servers make use of what are called "remailers", which are basically computers on the internet that forward electronic mail or files to other network addresses. Before the remailer forwards the information, it strips the header from the original email so that the information showing where the message originated is no longer attached to the email. Many anonymity services replace the header with anonymous addresses such as nobody@nowhere. The eventual recipient of the message then has no idea about who sent the email and where it originated. This type of service is termed truly anonymous. Other anonymity services use similar remailers, but also give each user an anonymous ID, almost like a mailbox on the server, which stores the address of the sender so that any replies to anonymous email can be forwarded to the original sender. This type of anonymity, called pseudonymity, allows users to be anonymous but reachable.

-History

Anonymous posting/reply services on the internet were started around 1988 and were introduced primarily for use on specific newsgroups which discussed particularly volatile, sensitive and personal subjects. One of the first of these services was started by Dave Mack for use on alt.sex.bondage. Anonymous postings on newsgroups such as this one soon became the primary method of communication. Anonymity services which utilized remailers for entire internet soon sprang up, combining the functions of anonymous posting as well as the anonymous  Cypherpunk groups in mid-1992. Global anonymity servers which served remailing in one service. The new global services also introduced the concept of pseudonymous emails which allowed replies to anonymous mail. These and other global servers which were started in the US died quickly as a result of numerous barriers such as attacks by net citizens and system administrators. The average life span of most anonymity servers is about 6 months because of these barriers and there are usually only 20 to 30 of these servers operating around the world at any one time. Some of the most used of these global servers include the Kleinpaste, Clunie and Helsingius servers. Even these servers were temporarily and/or permanently shut down due to the intense conflict surrounding their use. Foreign anonymity servers often fare better due to a more relaxed attitude of foreign system administrators.
The Helsingius server, which is run by Johan "Julf" Helsingius, is one of the most stable global anonymity servers. Julf Helsingius' original impetus to provide a global anonymity service was his desire to prove that censorship on the internet is impossible because there is always a technological solution which can circumvent the problem. Helsingius eventually expanded to worldwide service from Scandinavia due to a flood of international requests. This server, which is one of the most popular, currently has over 200,000 registered users. Although penet.fi has undergone numerous temporary shutdowns and has been involved in a recent police investigation, it has survived for over 3 years. Penet.fi and similar servers are currently the primary anonymity servers on the internet today. A list of some of the current anonymity services can be found at the University of California at Berkeley.

 

-Final thoughts:

This source provided me with enough information to make my decision to choose the following topic for my essay, and had me get started on collecting more statistics and necessary information. However, I am also concerned that this source is only showing a fraction of the whole truth, and it is having me develop a prejuice towards  prohibiting internet anonymity. I should get more research done to have an idea of the whole picture.