Self-Evaluation

1) What score do you think you deserve?
 
-I think I deserve 2points. I presented a thoughtful and logical argument with all the formats in place.

2) What did you do well?
 
-I did a good job in defining my points and gave a clear idea of what my arguments are about by recording down the logical processes clearly. Moreover, I also gave some clear examples that were ideal in supporting my opinions and strengthening my points.
 
3) What could you have done better?

-I could have made my essay simpler and more concise to the point. After reading the essay, I get an idea that my essay is too wordy. I should learn how to summarize my thoughts and present them in a much shorter way. It seems like I have too much things to say, but I did not manage to categorize them and put them down more clearly.
 
4) Which part of the classical argument did you use the best?

-I used the narration part the best. In my narration, I defined the term 'internet anonymity' so that the readers can have a better idea of what the whole essay is about. Moreover, brief facts and examples were also provided to help understand the topic better. I also put down some statements that should be taken in by the readers for the whole essay to make sense, and had my narration act as a basic foundation in my essay.
 
5) Which part of the classical argument did you use the most poorly?

-I did a poor job in my concession. Upon reading my essay, I thought I got caught up in my own logic and failed to see some perhaps obvious counter-agruments. This made my essay very biased. I think more could be done to improve on my concession and provide a fairer view of the thesis.

6) What's your strategy to make your second draft better?

-I will do more research to find out why internet anonymity should not be protected, and look at my essay from the opposing point of perspective to see it it makes sense. I will also try to edit my argument so that it includes some more basic points.